PROMOTION ORDERS OF 39 JUNIOR ENGINEERS ISSUED

Central Water Commission has issued promotion order of the 39 Junior Engineers, Copy of the same is placed hereunder-

 

CONFEDERATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES & WORKERS HAS WRITTEN LETTERS FOR IMMEDIATE FINALISATION OF PENDING AGENDA

CONFEDERATION WRITES TO SECRETARY PERSONNEL ON FIXATION OF PAY ON PROMOTION

D/16/2012 Dated: 10^th November, 2012.

To

The Secretary (Personnel)

Department of Personnel and Training,
Government of India
North Block,
New Delhi. 110 001

Sub: Fixation of pay on promotion:

Dear Sir,

It was agreed in the meeting of the National Anomaly Committee held on 17^th July, 2012 that wherever there is a provision of direct recruitment in the Recruitment Rules, pay on promotion would be fixed at the prescribed minimum of the entry pay as provided for the direct entrants in the revised pay rules. However a formal order in implementation of this order is yet to be issued.

We shall be grateful if necessary directions are issued for the issuance of formal orders in the matter.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

K.K.N. Kutty

Secretary General.

CONFEDERATION WRITES TO SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE ON FIXATION OF PAY ON PROMOTION CARRYING SAME GRADE PAY

D/16/2012 Dated: 10^th November, 2012.

To

The Secretary,

Department of Expenditure,
Ministry of Finance,
Government of India, North Block
New Delhi. 110 001

 Sub: Fixation of pay on promotion to a post carrying the same Grade pay.

Dear Sir,

It was agreed in the last National Anomaly Committee meeting held on 17^th July, 2012( as could be seen from the minutes issued in this regard) that in cases where promotion to a post carrying the same grade pay, benefit of one increment would be considered subject to the condition that the promotional post carries higher duties and responsibilities under FR 22 and fixation benefit under FR 22 (1)(a)(i) was available prior to the implementation of the 6^th CPC report and the merger of the two grades was not on functional considerations. However, in implementation of this agreement, no formal orders were issued so far.

We, therefore, request that necessary instruction may kindly be caused to be issued to grant one increment benefit to all those employees who are promoted where the feeder cadre and the promotion cadre carry the same grade pay, provided the promotional grade is declared to be a post carrying higher responsibilities. All those who were promoted during the period between 1.1.2006 and the date of issue of the instruction may also be covered by the said instruction specifically.

Thanking you,

                                                                                                                                                       Yours faithfully,

K.K.N. Kutty

Secretary General.

CONFEDERATION PRESIDENT WRITES TO STAFF SIDE SECRETARY

S.K. VYAS

PRESIDENT;

Dated: 10^th November, 2012.

Com. Umraomal Purohit,

Secretary, Staff Side, National Council, JCM\
13-C Ferozeshah Road,
New Delhi 110 001

Dear Comrade,

Kindly recall the discussions, I had with you two days back about the meeting held under the Chairmanship of JS(E) 27^th July, 2012 on MACP issues. As intimated to you, the minutes of the said meeting was prepared and circulated by the official side without causing any discussion with the Staff Side, which had been the practice all along with the result there had been serious omissions in the conclusions indicated therein. However, on the basis of our discussions, we suggest the following proposals:

(a) On our demand for giving effect to the MACP scheme from 1.1.2006.

Our suggestion at the meeting was that if not for the entire personnel, the Govt. may consider to grant the benefit of MACP scheme to the personnel retired between 1.1.2006 and 31.8.2008 effective from. 1.1.2006. This suggestion was made with a view that the personnel who were in service after 1.9.2008, no doubt get the MACP benefit, though belatedly. Only those who retired between the above crucial dates are denied the said benefit for ever. In my opinion, we may even go further and suggest that even in the case of those retired, the benefit may be made only notional, in as much as they may not be entitled to receive arrears of salary due to the revision of pay. They become entitled only the increased pension benefit and that too with effect from. 1.9. 2008.

(b) MACP on promotional hierarchy:

There had been no logical arguments placed by the official side for denying the option to be exercised by the individual employee as to whether he would like to retain the existing scheme of ACP or switch over to MACP. In the light of strong contention made by the Staff Side, it was in fact agreed that the official side will consider this proposal which was made by the Staff Side in fact as an alternative to the demand for masking MACP on the basis of promotional hierarchy in replacement of Grade Pay hierarchy. As large number of employees would be affected adversely if this just demand is denied, we feel that this issue must be pressed for acceptance.

We request you to kindly take up the above two formulations at the appropriate level as you deem fit and bring about a settlement at an early date.

With greetings,

Yours fraternally,

sd.

S.K.Vyas.

President